More often than not, a spray of a new men’s perfume leaves me sorely disappointed. Most of the recipes follow the same, cardboard-cutout pattern: a mono-dimensional burst of citrus leading to an overdose of lavender and Iso E Super before settling into an unremarkable drydown of thin woods, as though the juice actually wants to be forgettable. This is precisely the type of perfumery that I now, sadly, consider to be standard fare from the likes of Dolce & Gabbana, Davidoff and Ralph Lauren, but I genuinely didn’t think I’d ever feel so let down by a release from the house of Chanel. Allure For Men certainly wasn’t a masterpiece either, but I’m sorry to report that Jacques Polge et al have reached new depths of depressing predictability with Bleu. The fragrance’s advertising tagline is “Be Unexpected.” Well, guess what, they sure aren’t kidding, because I certainly never expected something so downright ordinary to be graced by the double-C logo.
There really isn’t very much one can say about it apart from the fact that it features an overly long bergamot opening and a quasi-woody-spicy middle section with no hint of originality whatsoever. From start to finish, it is an exercise in the most dismaying type of generic ‘pleasantness’, a timid perfume designed for a person determined not to make an individual mark on the world. Perhaps we, as blog-devouring perfume fanatics, have simply come to expect too much from what are, after all, massive, multi-national firms with unabashed commercial intentions. Perhaps the more we indulge our love of our bottled treasures, the more we’ll feel compelled to turn away from releases that wish to play it safe. Perhaps Bleu is just a very uninspiring piece of work. Either way, I’m sure it’ll make millions for Chanel and set back mainstream men’s perfumery by a good few years.
[Review based on a sample of eau de toilette obtained in 2010; fragrance tested on skin.]
Persolaise.
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.
Your review sums up pretty much what I thought when I tried this, albeit far more eloquently! I too was very disappointed, but in a way, not surprised.
" Perhaps we, as blog-devouring perfume fanatics, have simply come to expect too much from what are, after all, massive, multi-national firms with unabashed commercial intentions. Perhaps the more we indulge our love of our bottled treasures, the more we'll feel compelled to turn away from releases that wish to play it safe." And there is nothing wrong with that! 😉
Michael, thanks very much indeed for the compliment. And yes, 'disappointing' is the word. I just hope Bleu doesn't mark the direction for all future Chanel scents.
Frida, no, there's nothing wrong with it at all, but perhaps we just need to accept that large, multi-national firms aren't interested in pleasing the likes of us.
No, it's not you, it's them!
Have been smelling this on someone who is on my course. He's a lovely guy, but he is in the Bleu target market: people who like what I call 'eau de Gillette' ie. something that just smells of 'safe' and 'clean'. By choosing Chanel there is the illusion that it's classy and why wouldn't Chanel want to cash in on men who like 'eau de Gillette'? It is, after all, a company and not a charity. There are few companies large or small who consider consistency and integrity to be the most important thing. To look on the bright side, Les Exclusifs aren't half bad. We vote with our wallets!
Anon, you're quite right. But even though companies like Chanel aren't charities, I sometimes wish they'd use their 'social clout' to change attitude a little bit and make people feel confident enough to try braver scents.
I was given a sample of the Bleu after shave balm at a Sephora this summer and it just reminded me how vile I think the stuff is.